That’s no moon, it’s a space station...

Phobos is doomed. It is gradually spiralling towards Mars and eventually could slam into the planet’s surface, leaving a large crater as its parting gift. Believe it or not, this discovery led to speculation that Phobos could be a space station launched by an advanced Martian civilization.
At the time, calculations showed that the moon’s orbit was decaying at around 5 cm per year which was subsequently shown to be an overestimate. Phobos is in an unusually low orbit around Mars, and so it was thought that this drag could be caused by the upper atmosphere of the planet. Russian astrophysicist Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky set about calculating whether the atmosphere could indeed be responsible. What he found surprised not only him, but many others too.
For the atmosphere to be responsible, Phobos would have to be hollow, like an Easter Egg. If the moon were solid rock, the atmosphere would have little effect. A hollow moon would be susceptible because it contained so much less mass. But if the moon were hollow, it could not be a natural object.
That's no moon, it's a... no wait, it is a moon.
Credits: ESA/ DLR/ FU Berlin (G. Neukum)
Writing in the Irish Astronomical Journal in 1964, Estonian astronomer Ernst Öpik noted that there were in fact three possible reasons for Phobos’s orbit. The first was that the observations were in error and Phobos was not spiralling inwards. The second was as Shklovsky suggested – and Öpik agreed that if it were hollow then Phobos was artificial. The third suggestion was that Mars’s gravity acted across the moon producing a so-called tidal force, which could rob the moon of energy.
Dr S. Fred Singer, an American physicist, joined forces with Öpik to investigate. Singer doubted the decay rate was as large as 5 cm per year. He was right. Sadly for the UFO enthusiasts, Phobos was found to be decaying at just 1.8 cm per year and this allowed Singer and Öpik to show that the third case is the correct one. Tidal forces are responsible for the moon slowly spiralling downwards. Star Wars fans will remember the classic line from the first movie, “That’s no moon, it’s a space station.” For a while in the 1960s, some astronomers actually thought this might be true about Phobos. -- Stuart












22-08-2011 • 05:55:53
Every one understands that life seems to be very expensive, but different people require money for different issues and not every one gets big sums cash. Thus to get fast business loans or just short term loan will be a proper way out.
05-08-2010 • 21:00:33
LoL, God forbid that someone might suggest Phobos was an artificial body. Those us out there who dont [prove may have spontaneous aneurysms! Even if it was artificial we wouldnt want to know, and God help he whose job it may be to announce it!
09-03-2010 • 19:46:14
Dear Mr. Clark:
yes, please correct your article ASAP.
Your anecdotal (and, unfortunately, incorrect) recollections from graduate school regarding Dr. Singer made it all the way to Scientific American online, via Skymania, and caused quite a stir.
Paul Sutherland has been in direct contact with Dr. Singer, FYI.
Thanks for your cooperation. Cheers !
10-03-2010 • 12:14:27
Hope that's better. I've updated based on information forwarded from Paul. I am still hoping to hear directly from Professor Singer and will update again if need be.
Thanks for your help and apologies for the confusion.
09-03-2010 • 10:01:41
Just hearing that Fred Singer went onto to work with Öpik and was instrumental in going on to solve this problem - and that he claims not to have briefed the President at all.
Checking now and will update later. More soon.
25-02-2010 • 14:41:48
"Estonian astronomer Ernst Öpik"
That would be the grandfather of UK Parliament member Lembit Öpik ?
(It's always worth while knowing stuff about politicians when funding time comes around ; Öpik is fairly well known in the UK as being a "pro-science" MP)
01-03-2010 • 16:37:28
Excellent post!!
Yeap, according to wikipedia Lembit Öpik is indeed the grandson of Ernst :)
25-02-2010 • 02:59:02
When I was 12 years old, around 1970, I read a juvenile science fiction novel about American astronauts taken captive by the inhabitants of the artificial moon. It made a big impression on me.
24-02-2010 • 18:21:22
"The first was that the observations were in error and Mars was not spiralling inwards."
You mean the moon not Mars, and spiraling with one l I think?
24-02-2010 • 21:06:40
Thanks for spotting Mars, when I meant Phobos – all corrected now.
As for spiralling with one l - not in England. ;-)